Are You Serving God or is God Serving You?

Image result for priest of israel

Are you serving God? Serious questions now.  Are you in your desire to be a follower of Jesus actually following and serving Him in submission to Him?

You may answer – I am a christian or I go to church and that is great, but the questions goes a bit further.

Are you as a person submitting yourself to God in your worship and service of God….or is the god that you say you believe in actually serving you?

Confusing question?

Well, maybe but I was reading Judges yesterday and it occurred to me that since the beginning there have been a whole lot of people who call themselves religious and look religious with all the trappings that are not actually worshipping and serving God.  Rather, they are setting up religious systems that serve them.

Toward the end of the Book of Judges we run into a guy named Micah for example.  We don’t have the backstory on Micah.  He just appears in Judges 17 and 18 and then disappears but in the brief telling of this portion of life, boy do we get an interesting picture.

The account of Micah starts with him stealing 1100 shekels of silver from his mother.  Great beginning, right?  He is a thief stealing from his own Mother, but wait, it actually gets worse.

Micah decides to return the money to his mother and his mother seems happy to have her money back.  So much so that when Micah mentions he was planning on using the money to have idols made, a carved statue of a false god and a molded one, mommy gives him the money to do so.  Micah gets the idols made along with an ephod and sets up a mini-Temple service in his own house.

If you have ever seen ancestor shrines from some religions or the household altars that seem to be commonplace in some regions this is what Micah seems to be setting up, but on a larger scale.  He even goes so far as deciding that his son is going to be a priest of this household temple and his family comes and worships here.  God choose the Levites specifically to be priests, but Micah chooses his son – who do you think is correct on this issue?

While it is set out without comment in Judges, this procession of events in the Israel at that time is flat out insanity.

God has already given the Israelites the Law and Micah, his son and mother are all Israelites.  Contained among the Laws commandments are prohibitions against stealing, making a graven image, and worshipping false gods along with the specific direction to honor your mother.

How is Micah doing so far?

God also directs specifically how He is to be worshipped through the priestly system and through the Tabernacle that is then located in Shiloh and in accordance with the directions set out in the Bible.  Only the Levites shall be priests and only they should wear the garments associated with priestly service serving God at the Tabernacle.  The penalty for these transgressions should be death under the Law.

Yet, Micah openly and without any sort of shame or seeming awareness completely blows past all of these clear directions of God and jumps heartily into grave sin. The normalcy of his actions in the narrative speaks to the depravity of not just Micah’s family but all of Israel.  There is no one there that objects and calls Micah to account for his brazen rebellion.  Micah is a lost man in the midst of a lost a wicked generation.  Seems kind of like the world today, doesn’t it?

Even worse, when a Levite comes along looking for a place to stay, Micah sees this as an opportunity and hires the Levite to act as his priest.  “His priest” in case you missed it.  Micah is excited because he has a priest who works directly for him – you know the guys who are supposed to work, get paid by and only ever serve God.  Micah actually thinks the Levite works for him and this will be a good thing for him and his family.

He violates God’s specific directions in 800 different ways (exaggeration but only by a little) and the Law says he should be put to death and yet Micah really thinks that God will smile down upon him and bless him because he is acting religious.  It is just crazy talk and would be unbelievable if it were not true and was not what we are tempted to do all the time.  I know that I am in an adulterous relationship, but I go to church on Sundays so God will bless me, right?

What has Micah really done here though?

And what in the world does some dude in ancient Israel making a house temple and having a trained Levite to serve him have anything to do with us?

It is initially hard to see the application given all that is going on.  Truthfully, I had not read these verses in a while and my head was swimming trying to just keep track of all of the bad things that were going on.

But what Micah is actually doing in setting up his altars and buying off the priest?

He is taking God completely out of the worship of God and making religion all about Micah.  My house, my priest who I pay, my idol made from my silver, me, my, mine is what Micah is all about.  He has set up a religion of his own that he can control in order to get good stuff from it and not have to deal with such bad things like submission and worship of the real God.  There is no submission to God involved in Micah’s version of worship, just expressing Micah’s desires.  It is like having Jesus traveling with us, but not actually making any decisions or having any impact.  Jesus is in the sidecar to our motorcycle – we can say He is there but He really is having no impact.

Think about it – with Micah, God sets up the system that requires a person leave their own house and their own lands and travel to Bethel or Jerusalem in order to worship Him.  He requires that they pay close attention to the rules and submit sacrifices to God. When an Isrealite traveled from even Micah’s hometown that was actually pretty close to Bethel, they are submitting to the instruction of God and thereby admitting that He has the power to make the rules.  They are also taking part in something bigger than themselves and admitting that they need God’s structure to participate in the worship of God.  Humility and submission are tough pills to swallow for the natural man.

Micah is not humble and submits to no one.  Instead he makes himself god of his own house and his own little religion.  It is much easier and less challenging to serve yourself as god rather than the one true God.  It is also a great affront to God.

So in short, Micah is rebelling against God and creating a religion to serve Micah as god.  Sounds quite Old Testamenty, right? We don’t have these sort of things now, do we?

While there are not many Levites serving in houses these days serving shrines, how many different versions of religion have been created by false prophets and self involved men that are doing the very same thing in the world today.  Religions that solely serve the created man and not the creator.

Joseph Smith apparently loved women, so his religion conveniently allowed polygamy especially for the prophet so much so that he married other men’s wives while they were on missions Smith sent them on.  Mohammed loved power and conquests so when he became a powerful warlord, conveniently, his previously peaceful revelations from Allah turned to jihad.

Religions created to serve the desires of the men who created them are very popular in the world.

Closer to home even in the Christian world, how many churches and people are setting up false versions of Jesus’ church in order to serve themselves rather than submit to God.

If you are thinking that sounds strange, what else would you call the Word of Faith Movement or the Prosperity Gospel  movement.  People who have decided that if they are just faithful/prayerful/yell in a high pitched voice enough God will serve them and give them anything they want.  God is evidently a gumball machine,a subservient being who responds when you insert the right amount of money.  It is all about people again, just like Micah.

They have created a religion of their own choosing for their own benefit and seem to care not that God’s Word tells them not to do so.

In less egregious cases, how many decisions do we make where we have set out the goal and created a plan for carrying out that goal and then we ask Jesus for His blessing on that goal and plan.  Or we wait until we get a fork on our self appointed path to ask Jesus which way to go rather than asking Him from the outset what He wants us to do.  It is the contrast between Jesus driving the car from the outset and taking us in comfort where we want to go versus sidecar Jesus or Carrie Underwood’s Jesus take the wheel.  Our hands should never be on the wheel to begin with if we are letting God drive.

So when you start quoting the eminent theologian Carrie Underwood, that is a good sign you should stop typing, but the question for us as we seek to be faithful followers of Jesus in this fallen world remains.  Are we serving our Lord Jesus in faithful submission and obedience and letting our religion be an expression of worship of Him?  Or are we doing religion for our own purposes ultimately to satisfy ourselves?  The funny thing is that self serving religion is always ultimately hollow and unsatisfying.

Be the anti-Micah, where our story from beginning to end testifies to submission and obedience to Jesus and you will have a peace that surpasses all understanding.

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “Are You Serving God or is God Serving You?

  1. Since you mentioned Word of Faith and “prosperity” teachings as examples of bad theology, I wanted to share my experience attending a local Word of Faith church for three years, back in the late 90’s. The pastor had trained at Kenneth Hagin’s Rhema Bible Training Center in Tulsa, OK, as had many of the associate pastors and staff. My description of that time would go like this:

    I received outstanding teachings on walking in love, loving my enemies, forgiving others, surrendering to God, and learning to discern God’s voice / Holy Spirit. I watched as people were consistently prayed for – whether healing, financial trouble, relationship problems – staff always ready to counsel and pray. I heard a call to personal holiness – to put off the Old man and be clothed in Christ Jesus, to be renewed in my mind by the Word of God. I witnessed many outreaches to our community – food / clothing / pregnancy crisis – always accompanied by the gospel.

    As far as “God serving me” – I was taught, according to the Scriptures, to pray for my needs and even my desires in the context of my relationship to God and knowing His desires for me. I was taught to seek and to discern the Lord’s will. I was taught to pray with faith, believing that I have received before it ever happens (Mark 11:24) and to be persistent in prayer (Luke 18:1-8).

    As for finances, I was taught that everything I have comes from God, that God loves a cheerful and generous giver, that those who give toward the needs of others will receive a harvest of blessing so that they may continue to be generous toward others (2 Corinthians 9:6-15). I was taught that asking for things out of personal greed or selfishness will result in my receiving nothing from God (James 4:2-3).

    And of course, the singing and musical worship were very enthusiastic.

    Overall my experience was one of spiritual growth and grounding in God’s Word. The teachings on faith – on believing God and His Word despite circumstances to the contrary – were empowering and taught from the Scriptures, in context, and with appropriate cautions against abuse or misuse.

    It’s too bad that “Word of Faith” now carries such connotations of false doctrine and “prosperity” preaching. Some of that is deserved (due to false teachers) and some is merely assumed or misrepresented.

    I will say this: I’m less concerned about the excesses of WOF churches than I am of the many church buildings that offer weekly theological lectures while omitting any practical instruction on how to live a dynamic, transformed life, led by Holy Spirit. I would include my own Presbyterian upbringing in that category.

    Don

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Don – so you seemed to have a good experience with the church you were with yet the doctrines as preached seem quite a bit off.

      Do you think this is as a result the more prominent people from the movement just being more visible?

      Or has it changed over time?

      Or do you think the doctrine behind the WoF movement is misunderstood?

      From the outside, it seems like the Osteen’s and Paula White’s of the world have made themselves into little gods, making things like health, wealth etc are dependent upon what we do – what we speak, how much we tithe etc rather than the Sovereign will of God.

      And my wife and I are friendly with the local signs and wonders type church pastor, his wife and some of the people who attend that church. They are lovely people and I appreciate that they are following Jesus. I just disagree with the focus of the doctrine.

      Lastly, yes, agreed again – if we don’t have the Holy Spirit we are a sailing ship without any wind, we are going nowhere.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hey, that’s a great example. The preaching of Joel Osteen doesn’t bear much resemblance to the teachings I received, or even those of Kenneth Hagin, and you can’t get more Word of Faith than him. Joel almost completely omits any reference to the cross of Christ, atonement for sin, or the wrath of God. There is no “one way of salvation” in Joel’s message.

    In contrast, Kenneth Hagin frequently references the blood of Jesus and repentance from sin. There is no confusion that Jesus is the only name by which we must be saved. Even Joel’s father, John Osteen, preached the actual gospel, but not Joel. He never attended Rhema (or any Bible school that I know of) but is lumped in as a WOF preacher anyway.

    Real WOF teachings are not simply “name-it-and-claim-it” or prosperity teachings, they run the entire gamut of Christian faith and practice – sin, repentance, holiness, forgiveness, love, prayer, and of course, the cross of Christ.

    I still receive Kenneth Hagin’s magazine about every month – it’s free – and I still read teachings on all those things. Probably the biggest distinction is that WOF posits that, in many areas of life, we do know the will of God already, and so we can pray with absolute faith that we have already received our request (Mark 11:24; 1 John 3:21-22).

    This praying with faith, believing that we have received our request before it appears, is usually denied by denominational churches, who teach that we can never really know what God’s will is about anything, so we always have to add “if it be your will” to every request. Of course, this is appropriate for some prayers, but not for others, and Jesus distinctly taught on the power of praying and speaking without doubt / with absolute faith that a “yes” has been granted.

    So I guess I do see a level of misunderstanding out there, but with so many false or questionable preachers in the mix, I understand.

    Don

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s